Ace Report Cover
90-day and 1-year cost estimates of ORIF versus percutaneous pinning for displaced DRF
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Hand & Wrist
90-day and 1-year cost estimates of ORIF versus percutaneous pinning for displaced DRF
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 May 2;100(9):786-792

44 patients with an displaced, extraarticular distal radius fracture were randomized to fixation through either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar plate, or to closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). The purpose of the current study was to compare direct hospital costs and establish cost ratio during the perioperative period, after 90 days of follow-up, and after 1 year of follow-up. During the perioperative period, cost ratio was 2/7:1 of ORIF to CRPP. At 90 days and 1 year, cost ratios were reduced relative to that during the peroperative period, but remained statistically significant, with higher costs incurred within the ORIF compared to the CRPP group.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. 90-day and 1-year cost estimates of ORIF versus percutaneous pinning for displaced DRF. ACE Report. 2018;8(10):27. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report