ARTHROPLASTY
No difference in 10-yr clinical outcome and survivorship between mobile- and fixed-bearing TKA
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):925-929. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1473.R1240 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either a mobile-bearing tibial component, a modular-metal-backed fixed-bearing tibial component, or an all-polyethylene fixed-bearing tibial component. The purpose of the current study was to report 10-year survivorship, clinical scores, and range of motion between the three groups. Results at 10 years demonstrated no significant differences between any of the three groups.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
