Ace Report Cover
Improvement in disability did not significantly differ between 3D and 2D planning for DRF malunion
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Trauma
Improvement in disability did not significantly differ between 3D and 2D planning for DRF malunion
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jul 18;100(14):1191-1202

40 patients with a distal radius malunion were randomized to either 3-dimensional (3D) or 2-dimensional (2D) preoperative planning for corrective osteotomy. The primary outcome was the change in patient-reported disability on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire over 12-month follow-up; secondary measures included visual analog scales for pain and satisfaction, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, and radiographic assessment of deformity correction. No significant differences between groups were noted in the changes of the DASH, PRWE, VAS pain, or VAS satisfaction after 3, 6 or 12 months.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Improvement in disability did not significantly differ between 3D and 2D planning for DRF malunion. ACE Report. 2018;8(10):20. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report