SHOULDER & ELBOW
Similar functional outcome between nonoperative & operative treatment for proximal humerus fractures
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):1526-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.009
Seven randomized controlled trials and 15 observational studies were included in this meta-analysis which compared outcomes of operative treatment and nonoperative treatment for proximal humeral fractures. Pooled analyses for functional outcome on the Constant-Murley score demonstrated no significant differences between operative and nonoperative groups. Data from observational studies suggested higher rates of major reintervention and avascular necrosis development among operative groups, though these findings were not reflected in data from randomized controlled trials.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
