
Spine
No difference between a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt and lumbar support on walking capacity
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):386-394.104 patients with lumbar stenosis and symptomatic neurogenic claudication were randomized to receive a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt or a lumbar support. The primary outcome of interest was walking capacity, measured with the self-paced walking test (SPWT). The proportion of patients who displayed a minimum 30% and 50% improvement in the SPWT was also calculated. Follow up was performed within a week of baseline testing. Results from the study revealed no significant differences between groups in SPWT results. Furthermore, the proportion of patients who displayed a minimum 30% or 50% improvement in the SPWT was not significantly different between the two treatment groups. Interestingly, a higher proportion of patients in the prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt group experienced discomfort while wearing the belt compared to the lumbar support group.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.