AceReport Image
SPORTS MEDICINE
No difference in long term clinical outcomes between remnant debridement and preservation in ACLR
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb;27(2):516-523.
Contributing Authors

S Gohil JR Ebert PT Annear EJ Rohr DM Hille

49 skeletally mature patients scheduled for an arthroscopically-assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction were randomized to have the procedure performed with a remnant preservation or remnant debridement technique. Outcomes of interest included the incidence and timing of both ACL re-tear in the ipsilateral knee or tear in the contralateral knee, requirement of at least 1 additional surgery in the ipsilateral and contralateral knees, proportion of patients returning to unrestricted activity, and knee function (measured on a numerical rating scale). Follow up was performed 10 years post-operation. The results of the study revealed a significantly higher number of patients who required an additional surgery in the ipsilateral knee in the remnant preservation group compared to the remnant debridement group. There were no significant differences between groups in the rate of re-tear, rate of tear in the contralateral knee, requirement of additional surgery in the contralateral knee, proportion of patients returning to unrestricted activity, or knee function.

Unlock the full ACE Report

You have access to {0} free articles per month.
Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
{0} of {1} free articles

Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.

Upgrade Now
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade Account
Upgrade
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. No difference in long term clinical outcomes between remnant debridement and preservation in ACLR . ACE Report. 2019;9(6):17. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report