
Arthroplasty
COA/ICORS2019: No difference in functional outcomes with collared vs. collarless implants in THA
100 patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis and scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized to receive either a collared or collarless cementless femoral stem implant. Outcomes of interest included implant subsidence, step count and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Follow up was performed up to two years post-operation. Results revealed significantly more implant subsidence in the collarless group compared to the collared group in the first 2 post-operative weeks. Otherwise, no significant differences in implant subsidence (between two weeks and 3 months), change in step count or change in TUG test were observed between the collared and collarless groups.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.