ARTHROPLASTY
Cementless TKA Results in Better Pain, ROM, and Radiographic Outcomes in Young Patients
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 ;():. 10.1186/s13018-019-1293-8The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials comparing cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years of age. The authors searched four databases and included six trials, with 255 patients in the cemented group and 229 patients in the cementless group. Outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Score (KSS), Range of Motion (ROM), pain, presence of radiolucent lines, aseptic loosening, and major complications (revisions + deep infections). The patients in the cementless group performed significantly better in terms of pain scores and range of motion.There was no significant difference in terms of KSS, ROM, aseptic loosening, or complication rates.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
