Faster return to work, but no other differences with early vs. delayed mobilization in Achilles tear
J Foot Ankle Surg.2019;58(5):938-945.Achilles tendon ruptures can be treated both operatively and non-operatively. With either technique, patients can be either be immobilized initially, or allowed some weight-bearing and range of motion, otherwise known as "Early" or "Functional" rehabilitation. While early mobilization may have benefits in terms of return to activity and function, it is unclear whether it is also associated with adverse events. In this study, the authors assessed 14 randomized controlled trials which compared these protocols. Overall, on a wide range of outcomes including adverse events, function, and return to work and sport, the only significant difference was a slightly faster return to work time with the early mobilization group.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
