
Trauma
No difference in deep infection rate with iNPWT and standard wound dressing in low fracture surgery
JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):519-526.One thousand five hundred and forty-eight patients presenting with a lower extremity fracture caused by major trauma received surgical intervention followed by surgical wound dressing with an incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) device or with standard sterile dressing. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of deep surgical site infection within the first 30 days post-operation. Secondary outcomes of interest included the Disability Rating Index (DRI), the EQ-5D quality of life measure, EQ-5D on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the patient and observer scar assessment scale, and the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain as determined by the Douleur Neuropathique Questionnaire. Results revealed no significant differences between the iNPWT and standard groups in all outcomes.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.