Ace Report Cover
No difference in deep infection rate with iNPWT and standard wound dressing in low fracture surgery
Download
Reprints
Cite This
+ Favorites
Download
Reprints
Cite This
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
TRAUMA
No difference in deep infection rate with iNPWT and standard wound dressing in low fracture surgery
JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):519-526.

One thousand five hundred and forty-eight patients presenting with a lower extremity fracture caused by major trauma received surgical intervention followed by surgical wound dressing with an incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) device or with standard sterile dressing. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of deep surgical site infection within the first 30 days post-operation. Secondary outcomes of interest included the Disability Rating Index (DRI), the EQ-5D quality of life measure, EQ-5D on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the patient and observer scar assessment scale, and the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain as determined by the Douleur Neuropathique Questionnaire. Results revealed no significant differences between the iNPWT and standard groups in all outcomes.

Unlock the full ACE Report

You have access to {0} free articles per month.
Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
{0} of {1} free articles

Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.

Upgrade Now
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade Account
Upgrade
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. No difference in deep infection rate with iNPWT and standard wound dressing in low fracture surgery. ACE Report. 2020;10(4):1. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report