Comparing supervised and unsupervised rehabilitation in rotator cuff repair surgery
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8).Four studies enrolling a total of 132 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing supervised and unsupervised rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair surgery. Outcomes of interest included function, range of motion, cost-effectiveness and pain outcomes, however only pain scores at rest were meta-analyzed. The pooled results of the meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in pooled Visual Analog Scale pain scores at rest between the two groups.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
