Ace Report Cover
Internal Fixation vs Functional Bracing for Treatment of Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures
Download
Reprints
Cite This
+ Favorites
Download
Reprints
Cite This
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
TRAUMA
Internal Fixation vs Functional Bracing for Treatment of Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1792-1801.

Eighty-two patients with closed, displaced humeral shaft fractures were randomized to receive an open reduction and internal plate fixation procedure or functional bracing. The primary outcome of interest was the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores at 12 months. Secondary outcomes of interest included pain scores at rest and during activities on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Constant-Murley scores, elbow range of motion, 15D quality of life scores, and patient satisfaction outcomes. Outcomes were assessed up to 12 months post-treatment. Results revealed significantly favourable DASH scores, pain scores during activity, Constant-Murley scores, elbow range of motion, DASH work module scores, and patient satisfaction with shoulder function and upper limb function in the surgery group compared to the bracing group. However at 12 months post-operation, no significant differences in all outcomes were observed between the two groups, with exception of DASH sports module scores which were significantly in favour of the surgery group. At 12 months, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the surgery group were willing to repeat the same treatment compared to the bracing group.

Unlock the full ACE Report

You have access to {0} free articles per month.
Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
{0} of {1} free articles

Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.

Upgrade Now
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade Account
Upgrade
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Internal Fixation vs Functional Bracing for Treatment of Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures. ACE Report. 2020;10(6):12. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report