Nonsurgical Therapies and the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Knee Osteoarthritis
JBJS Reviews. 2019;7(8):e5
Thirty-seven guidelines and meta-analyses were included in this systematic review. The main objective was to determine the amount of variation in the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) used to compare pain in knee osteoarthritis literature. The secondary objective was to evaluate the treatment effects of non-surgical interventions against various MCID thresholds.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
