AceReport Image
Osteoarthritis
Nonsurgical Therapies and the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Knee Osteoarthritis

JBJS Reviews. 2019;7(8):e5

Thirty-seven guidelines and meta-analyses were included in this systematic review. The main objective was to determine the amount of variation in the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) used to compare pain in knee osteoarthritis literature. The secondary objective was to evaluate the treatment effects of non-surgical interventions against various MCID thresholds.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Nonsurgical Therapies and the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Knee Osteoarthritis. ACE Report. 2020;():. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report