Ace Report Cover
Lower fusion rates observed with Trabecular Metal versus Smith-Robinson for ACDF
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Spine
Lower fusion rates observed with Trabecular Metal versus Smith-Robinson for ACDF
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.
Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):464-73. Epub 2009 Sep 18

80 patients scheduled to undergo anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) were randomized to receive an application of porous tantalum metal (TM) trabecular graft or the standard Smith-Robinson (SR) iliac crest autograft. Patients treated with TM were observed to have lower fusion rates compared to those treated with SR. Both treatments had similar clinical outcomes in the 2 year study period.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Lower fusion rates observed with Trabecular Metal versus Smith-Robinson for ACDF. ACE Report. 2013;3(3):93. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report