
Arthroplasty
Mini-midvastus approach has better short term outcomes for TKA than standard approach
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 May;90(5):584-91
100 patients, aged between 50 and 80 years, with osteoarthritis of the knee joint requiring total knee replacement (TKR) were randomized to the surgical approach, either a minimally invasive mid-vastus approach or a standard approach. Minimally invasive surgical approach led to better functional outcomes (mean function score, mean total score, mean oxford score) at earlier time point of 9 months, with a greater and accelerated recovery of flexion, but this difference was lost at a later final follow up of 24-36 months.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.