
General Orthopaedics
Drained vs. undrained wounds: No significant difference in outcomes following hip surgery
Int Orthop. 2008 Dec;32(6):723-7. Epub 2007 Aug 9This meta-analysis and systematic review identified 6 randomized trials that compared the use of closed suction drainage compared to no drainage in hip fracture surgery. A total of 664 patients were identified from these 6 studies. Results from the analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between drained and undrained wounds, in terms of wound infection, wound haematoma, re-operations for complications, and need for transfusion. As a result, uncertainty remained regarding the effectiveness of the use of drainage systems in hip fracture surgery.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.