ARTHROPLASTY
Posterior cruciate substituting TKA implant superior to cruciate retaining
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):368-74. Epub 2011 Jun 15.29 patients (58 knees), undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, were randomized to receive a high-flex cruciate retaining implant (CR) in one knee and a high-flex posterior cruciate substituting implant (PS) in the other. The goal of this study was to evaluate superiority between these two designs in terms of clinical, functional and patient satisfaction outcomes at a minimum of three years. The PS implant demonstrated significantly greater ROM, patient satisfaction, and a reduction in the incidence of posterior knee pain.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
