
Arthroplasty
Posterior cruciate substituting TKA implant superior to cruciate retaining
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):368-74. Epub 2011 Jun 15.29 patients (58 knees), undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, were randomized to receive a high-flex cruciate retaining implant (CR) in one knee and a high-flex posterior cruciate substituting implant (PS) in the other. The goal of this study was to evaluate superiority between these two designs in terms of clinical, functional and patient satisfaction outcomes at a minimum of three years. The PS implant demonstrated significantly greater ROM, patient satisfaction, and a reduction in the incidence of posterior knee pain.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.