
Arthroplasty
No difference between patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing during TKR
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jun;88(6):734-958 patients with degenerative osteoarthritis undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) were included in a study exploring whether or not resurfacing of the patella leads to optimal results. Patients were randomized to undergo TKR with or without a cemented polyethylene patellar component. At 10 years, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to pain, functioning and prevalence of patella crepitus. Results from this study were therefore inconclusive in determining the relative effectiveness of patellar resurfacing compared to non-resurfacing.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.