
Arthroplasty
Cross-linked liners wear at a lower rate than non–cross-linked polyethylene liners
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):17-25.220 patients requiring total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive a total hip arthroplasty with a non-cross-linked Enduron liner or a total hip arthroplasty with a cross-linked Marathon polyethylene liner. Two-dimensional head penetration and corresponding volumetric head displacement (Hip Analysis Suit), implant stability, osteolysis (radiographic review), and patient-perceived functional outcome data (questionnaire) were measured throughout the course of the study. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 years it was found that there was no significant difference in patient-perceived functional outcomes, but the Marathon group had a significant reduction in mean wear rate and incidence of osteolysis.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.