
Arthroplasty
No long term difference between less invasive TKA and conventional TKA
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6):777-82.89 patients (102 knees) requiring total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty (NA-LIS TKA) or conventional total knee arthroplasty (CON TKA). Range of motion, ability to perform 90 degree flexion and straight leg raise, extension lags, and pain were measured throughout the course of the study. The NA-LIS TKA group had better outcome scores than the CON TKA group during the early postoperative period, but by the end of the two week study, there was no significant difference in outcome measurements between the NA-LIS TKA and CON TKA groups.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.