SPINE
Surgical treatment of spine fracture more cost-effective than non-surgical treatment
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Indian J Orthop. 2007 Oct;41(4):332-6
32 patients with a traumatic throracolumbar spine fracture were randomized to undergo one of two treatments. One group underwent surgical treatment while the second group had a non-surgical treatment. The primary outcomes of interest were the direct and indirect costs incurred from either treatment. Cost of illness (COI) was calculated using the human capital approach where direct costs are calculated based on market prices and indirect costs are calculated by loss of productivity due to morbidity and mortality. Results showed that surgical treatment resulted in better outcomes and a lower total cost compared to non-surgical treatment.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
