ARTHROPLASTY
TKA: No difference between mini-midvastus and standard medial parapatellar approach
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Knee. 2012 Dec;19(6):866-71. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 May 18
80 patients, recruited between November 2004 and February 2008, undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomised to a mini-midvastus (MMV) approach or a medial parapatellar (MPP) approach. The patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-operatively. There were no significant differences in functional outcome parameters (Knee Society Scores, Oxford Knee Score, SF-36) between the MMV and the standard MPP approach.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
