ARTHROPLASTY
THA: Use of LIA or intrathecal morphine show no difference in occurrence of adverse events
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):695-705. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02667.x. Epub 2012 Mar 760 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia were included in this study to compare the occurrence of adverse outcomes between two analgesic treatments. Patients were randomized to receive either local infiltration analgesia (LIA) or intrathecal morphine (it-M) after THA. When examined during the first 48 hours post-operatively, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events between LIA and it-M. Patients receiving LIA demonstrated slightly better early mobilization at 6 hours but this difference was not sustained at subsequent time points.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
