FOOT & ANKLE
Calcaneal fracture: Absorbable screws Vs metallic plates, fewer complications with screw
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):E106-10
97 patients were randomized to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of two operative different treatments for calcaneal fractures. Patients received either metallic plates or absorbable screws, and were followed up at an average of 23 months. Results indicated that while both methods produced favourable outcomes in treating calcaneal fractures, the absorbable screws were associated with fewer complications.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
