Home
ACE Reports
All Specialties All Specialties All Specialties Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Evidence Based Medicine Evidence Based Medicine Evidence Based Medicine Foot & Ankle Foot & Ankle Foot & Ankle General Orthopaedics General Orthopaedics General Orthopaedics Hand & Wrist Hand & Wrist Hand & Wrist Metabolic Disorders Metabolic Disorders Metabolic Disorders Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Pediatric Orthopaedics Pediatric Orthopaedics Pediatric Orthopaedics Peri-Operative Peri-Operative Peri-Operative Physical Therapy & Rehab Physical Therapy & Rehab Physio & Rehab Shoulder & Elbow Shoulder & Elbow Shoulder & Elbow Spine Spine Spine Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Trauma Trauma Trauma Tumour Tumour Tumour Author Interviews Author Interviews Author Interview Conference Report Conference Report Conference Reports
Original Content
News
Multimedia
About
Search
Home
ACE Reports
Arthroplasty Evidence Based Medicine Foot & Ankle General Orthopaedics Hand & Wrist Metabolic Disorders Osteoarthritis Pediatric Orthopaedics Peri-Operative Physical Therapy & Rehab Shoulder & Elbow Spine Sports Medicine Trauma Tumour Author Interviews Conference Report
Original Content
News
Multimedia
About
Search
Previous Ace Report Double-Bundle ACL reconstructions leads to better outcomes compared to single bundle Next Ace Report Double-Bundle ACL reconstructions leads to better outcomes compared to single bundle
Ace Report Cover
Arthroplasty
Composite-beam and sliding-taper prostheses show no difference in femoral bone loss
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Arthroplasty
Composite-beam and sliding-taper prostheses show no difference in femoral bone loss
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan 2;95(1):19-27. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00657
Contributing Authors

RL Jayasuriya SC Buckley AJ Hamer RM Kerry I Stockley MW Tomouk JM Wilkinson

120 patients were randomized to evaluate whether the geometry of the cemented femoral prosthesis affected the pattern of strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the proximal aspect of the femur following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients received either composite-beam or sliding-taper (double and triple-tapered) prostheses and were assessed at 2 years. Results indicated that the magnitude and regional distribution of proximal femoral bone loss were similar between patients who received sliding-taper or composite-beam prostheses. Furthermore, similar bone remodeling pattern was observed between double and triple-tapered prostheses.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with

OR
Forgot Password?
OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Composite-beam and sliding-taper prostheses show no difference in femoral bone loss. ACE Report. 2013;3(3):233. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report