
Sports Medicine
Two laxity based graft tension protocols produce similar results during ACL Reconstruction
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):25-34. doi: 10.1177/0363546512464200. Epub 2012 Nov 9
90 patients, undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, were randomised to receive the surgery using different graft tension procedures, to compare the clinical, functional, and osteoarthritis (OA) imaging outcomes. One group had anterior posterior (AP) laxity returned by means of low autograft tension, while the other had high autograft tension. The two groups were then compared to a control group, consisting of 60 matched healthy subjects not needing ACL reconstruction. Following assessments over a 36 month period, there were no differences in any outcomes between the two \"laxity-based\" autograft tension protocols, but significant differences existed between the tension groups and the control group. Many outcomes were not completely restored in the two tension groups, when compared to healthy knees.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.