
Arthroplasty
THR with hip resurfacing implant shows similar outcome in gait as conventional prosthesis
Int Orthop. 2011 May;35(5):667-74. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1040-6. Epub 2010 May 16This trial randomized 30 patients to either a hip resurfacing system or conventional prosthesis total hip replacement (THR) to compare their gait mechanics over the short term. The 12 week assessment revealed that there were no significant differences between the techniques regarding kinetic, kinematic, or temporal-spatial gait parameter variables of the hip (except for peak abductor moments, which favoured the conventional treatment). Additional long-term assessments using larger sample sizes are required to further compare between these two treatment options.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.