HAND & WRIST
Modified Manual Edema Mobilization Treatment needs fewer sessions
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Hand Ther. 2011 Jul-Sep;24(3):184-93; quiz 194. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Dec 30
To compare two techniques in reducing edema, 30 patients with subacute hand/arm edema after a distal radius fracture were randomized to either receive modified Manual Edema Mobilization (MEM) approach or traditional edema treatment. After 9 weeks, both treatments had the same results in active range of motion (AROM), pain, and activities of daily living (ADL) and edema reduction. However, MEM needed fewer sessions to achieve same results.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
