
Arthroplasty
Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty no better than manual implantation
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85-A(8):1470-8154 patients scheduled for total hip replacement were randomized to undergo either conventional manual implantation of an S-ROM prosthesis or robotic-assisted implantation of such prosthesis using the five-axis ROBODOC. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically through a 24 month follow-up period. Eighteen percent (18%) of attempted robotic implantations failed and had to be converted to manual implantation. Limb-length equality and varus-valgus orientation of the stem were better immediately postoperatively in the robotic group. By 24 months, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of clinical scores. Dislocations were significantly more frequent in the robotic surgery group (11/61 compared to 3/80), as were revision surgeries (8/61 compared to 0).
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.