AceReport Image
ARTHROPLASTY
Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty no better than manual implantation
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85-A(8):1470-8

154 patients scheduled for total hip replacement were randomized to undergo either conventional manual implantation of an S-ROM prosthesis or robotic-assisted implantation of such prosthesis using the five-axis ROBODOC. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically through a 24 month follow-up period. Eighteen percent (18%) of attempted robotic implantations failed and had to be converted to manual implantation. Limb-length equality and varus-valgus orientation of the stem were better immediately postoperatively in the robotic group. By 24 months, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of clinical scores. Dislocations were significantly more frequent in the robotic surgery group (11/61 compared to 3/80), as were revision surgeries (8/61 compared to 0).

Unlock the full ACE Report

You have access to {0} free articles per month.
Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
{0} of {1} free articles

Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.

Upgrade Now
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade Account
Upgrade
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty no better than manual implantation. ACE Report. 2014;4(9):61. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report