
ARTHROPLASTY
Cemented Mallory-Head hip prostheses require more revisions
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84-A(10):1823-8250 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis were randomized to receive a Mallory-Head total hip prosthesis with either cement or uncemented insertion. Outcomes assessed were mortality, revision arthroplasty, and health-related quality of life measured with surveys. Over an average follow-up of 6.3 years, the cemented group had significantly more femoral components revised compared to the cementless group. Other outcome measures were similar or nonsignificantly different between groups.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in


Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now