
Physical Therapy & Rehab
LBP: No significant differences between early thrust and non-thrust spinal manipulation
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Man Ther. 2013 Jun;18(3):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 2
154 patients over the age of 18 years presenting with mechanically producible low back pain were randomized to receive an early treatment with spinal manipulation, using either a thrust or non-thrust technique, to compare these two methods in terms of pain and disability. Results at discharge from physiotherapist care indicated that, although both significantly improved at all time points, there was no significant difference in pain and disability at discharge between the two groups. Furthermore, it was found that personal equipoise of the treating physiotherapist had a significant influence on both pain and disability. Lastly, there was no significant difference between groups in rate of recovery, total visits, days in care, or the patient's beliefs about avoiding activity.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.