Ace Report Cover
Pulsatile vs standard compression: no significant difference against deep vein thrombosis
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Trauma
Pulsatile vs standard compression: no significant difference against deep vein thrombosis
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jul;83-A(7):1047-51

107 patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures requiring internal fixation were randomized to receive prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis with either a thigh-calf low-pressure sequential-compression device (Group A) or a calf-foot high-pressure pulsatile-compression pump (Group B). Patients were assessed for the development of deep vein thrombosis (by duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance venography), which trended toward lower prevalence in Group B, but did not reach significance. Higher rates of thrombosis were associated with increasing patient age and the time between injury and surgery.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Pulsatile vs standard compression: no significant difference against deep vein thrombosis. ACE Report. 2014;4(9):36. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report