
Arthroplasty
Benefits seen with no drains used in total hip arthroplasty
Acta Orthop Belg. 2010 Oct;76(5):619-27153 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to undergo the operation with either a conventional suction drain, an autologous blood transfusion drain, or no drain. There was no significant difference in drainage between the suction drain group and the autologous transfusion drain group. Patients receiving no drain had a lower rate of allogeneic transfusion and wounds that dried significantly sooner compared to patients with suction drains. Patients with no drain also had a significantly shorter stay in hospital compared to the suction drain group.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.