
Foot & Ankle
Operative vs. Non-operative treatment of calcaneal fractures
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1351-7
82 patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures of > 2mm displacement (verified by computed tomography scans) were randomly assigned into operative or non-operative groups, to compare the effectiveness of each treatment. The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the two groups at the one year follow up in terms of pain (VAS), or physical/mental functioning (SF-36). There was however, a trend observed at the eight-twelve year follow-up in VAS pain and function scores, and physical SF-36 scores, in favour of the operative group. The study also indicated that while operative treatment lead to a higher risk of complications, it also resulted in significantly reduced risk of subtalar arthritis.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.