
Sports Medicine
Independent drilling methods similar to transtibial drilling in ACL reconstruction
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2693-702
Six randomized clinical studies were included in this meta-analysis to determine how clinical outcomes and knee laxity compare between preparation of the femoral tunnel in through independent drilling - such as anteromedial portal or an outside-in approach - and transtibial drilling in ACL reconstruction. Clinical trial results suggested a possible increase to Lysholm scores and lower instrumented anterior laxity with independent drilling versus transtibial drilling, but clinically, Lysholm score was comparable between groups. However, IKDC Objective and Tegner scores were comparable between independent and transtibial drilling techniques. Evidence from cadaveric studies indicated closer placement of the femoral tunnel to the native ACL footprint with independent drilling compared to transtibial drilling. Evidence from 22 high-quality studies in ACL reconstruction suggested similar rate of graft failure between methods.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.