
ARTHROPLASTY
Ceramic-on-ceramic vs. ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing for THA
Int Orthop. 2013 Nov;37(11):2131-7One hundred patients (200 hips) under the age 50 years who were scheduled to receive total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned two different bearing types (one for each hip) to compare cementless THA using alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. The results of the study indicated that both alumina-on-alumina ceramic and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings provided significantly improved midterm fixation and pain relief into the second decade after surgery, and provide high rates of survivorship without osteolysis. Alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings were found to produce less squeaking and clicking noises following treatment than the alumina-on-alumina bearing.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in


Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now