ARTHROPLASTY
Imageless computer-assisted navigation yields superior cup placement vs freehand in THA
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):786-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Nov 26
130 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized to undergo the procedure using either a computer-assisted imageless navigation system or a freehand technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the angles of inclination and anteversion of the acetabular cup, along with functional outcomes. Results at a mean follow-up of 1.5 years indicated that the mean deviation from the safe zone and the number of outliers were significantly lower in the computer-assisted navigation group compared to the conventional group, for both angles of inclination and anteversion. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to functional outcomes or the incidence of complications.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
