SHOULDER & ELBOW
Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures
Orthopedics. 2014 May 1;37(5):e410-9Six randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis investigating the efficacy between operative and nonoperative treatment for complex 3- and 4-part humeral fractures. Overall, outcomes were similar between operative and nonoperative treatment, with few differences noted in functional outcome up to 24 months. Operative management required more additional surgery than did nonoperative treatment, and implants demonstrated a significant rate of penetration into joint spaces. Upon sub-group analyses for these findings, differences were in large part due to open reduction and internal fixation; hemiarthroplasty in the subgroup analyses was found to be statistically similar to nonoperative treatment.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
