
Spine
Thrust vs. non-thrust therapy for PPT in chronic neck pain patients
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):312-9
Fifty two patients suffering from bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain were randomized to receive either spine thrust manipulation or non-thrust mobilization to determine the efficacy of the former. Patients were monitored over 10 minutes after intervention and were assessed based on pressure pain sensitivity and intensity. The results of this study demonstrated similar improvements in pain pressure threshold (PPT) in bot the thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization groups. Within-group and between-group effect sizes were small. Thrust patients experienced a greater decrease in neck pain; within-group effect sizes were large for both groups, and between-group effect sizes were large in favor of thrust.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.