GENERAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Higher impact clinical journals offer higher quality systematic reviews
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):754-9
Over a 6 month period, 327 interventional systematic reviews were analyzed to determine the relation between high impact journals and systematic review quality. Results from the review indicated that systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals had higher methodological quality than those found in journals with a lower impact factor. In depth analysis suggested that reviews which did not contain a listing of excluded studies or assessments of publication bias were lower quality (assessed by AMSTAR).
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
