ARTHROPLASTY
Blood loss similar in posterior-cruciate-ligament-retaining vs -stabilized TKA
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1865-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2818-z. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
100 patients diagnosed with unilateral primary knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive a posterior-cruciate-ligament-retaining (PCR) or a posterior-cruciate-ligament stabilized (PS) approach to primary cemented total knee arthroplasty. Blood loss and blood transfusion volumes were compared between treatment groups. Results revealed the PS approach did not influence the amount of postoperative blood loss or need for blood transfusions in the 5 day postoperative period when compared to the PCR technique.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
