SPINE
Comparable results with 2 implants for scoliosis: Surgeon preference unrelated to outcome
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2684-93129 adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis were randomised to undergo one of two implant and spinal fusion treatments. The first group received treatment with the Moss Miami system while the second group received treatment with the Universal Spine System for spinal fusion. Results demonstrated comparable outcomes in patient quality of life and curve correction at the 2-year follow-up. Surgeon preference of implant system did not significantly affect patient outcomes.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
