SPINE
Microdiscectomy improves clinical outcome compared to open surgery for slipped lumbar disc
Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep;23(9):1992-9200 patients with large uncontained lumbar disc herniation were randomized to either open (OPEN) or microendoscopic discectomy (MED). The purpose was to compare clinical outcomes of both techniques over an 8 year period. Clinical measures included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg and back pain, as well as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). After 8 years, NRS leg and back pain were lower in patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy, as was ODI score. Secondarily, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and return to work were all reduced within the MED group compared to the OPEN group.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
