
Arthroplasty
OTA 2014: Enrollment difficulty to compare ORIF & arthroplasty for acetabular fracture
A randomized study at a single trauma center was conducted to determine if it would be feasible to perform a full-scale randomized controlled trial comparing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and concomitant ORIF in patients over 60 with an acetabular fracture. Patients presenting to the trauma center were screened over a 2.5 year time frame. Of 65 patients presenting within that time, only 27 met inclusion/exclusion criteria, and only 9 of the 27 agreed to participate. Recruitment rate was an unfeasible 14% (9/65).
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.