
Arthroplasty
Autologous blood transfusion drainage vs. no drainage or closed-suction drainage in THA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Nov;134(11):1623-3112 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis which focused on postoperative outcomes and complications in patients treated with autologous blood transfusion drainage, closed suction drainage or no drainage following primary total hip arthroplasty. Data on blood loss, transfusion rate, Hb level, hematoma, swelling, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and complications was considered for meta-analysis. Results indicated postoperative Hb level, transfusion rate, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay found no significant differences between the three drainage options. While pooled estimates suggested potentially lower blood loss with ABT drainage compared to no drainage, as well as a lower incidence of superficial infection compared to either no drainage or closed suction drainage. It should be noted that pooling was limited to a small number of studies and that larger randomized controlled trials are needed to provide further assessment.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.