AceReport Image
ARTHROPLASTY
Autologous blood transfusion drainage vs. no drainage or closed-suction drainage in THA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Nov;134(11):1623-31
Contributing Authors

N Li P Li M Liu D Wang L Xia

12 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis which focused on postoperative outcomes and complications in patients treated with autologous blood transfusion drainage, closed suction drainage or no drainage following primary total hip arthroplasty. Data on blood loss, transfusion rate, Hb level, hematoma, swelling, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and complications was considered for meta-analysis. Results indicated postoperative Hb level, transfusion rate, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay found no significant differences between the three drainage options. While pooled estimates suggested potentially lower blood loss with ABT drainage compared to no drainage, as well as a lower incidence of superficial infection compared to either no drainage or closed suction drainage. It should be noted that pooling was limited to a small number of studies and that larger randomized controlled trials are needed to provide further assessment.

Unlock the full ACE Report

You have access to {0} free articles per month.
Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
{0} of {1} free articles

Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.

Upgrade Now
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade Account
Upgrade
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Autologous blood transfusion drainage vs. no drainage or closed-suction drainage in THA. ACE Report. 2014;4(12):5. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report