TRAUMA
Operative versus nonoperative treatment for adults with displaced clavicle fractures
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1047-53.5 randomized controlled trials (n=369) were included in this systematic review to compare operative and nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults with respect to fracture healing, complications and functional outcome. Collective analysis revealed significant difference in time to union, and functional scores at 6 and 12 months between operative and non-operative interventions. Major secondary surgery was more frequent in the nonoperative group, whereas minor secondary surgery was more frequent in the operative group.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
