AceReport Image
ARTHROPLASTY
Navigation-guided versus fluoroscopy-controlled THA: leg length and global/femoral offset
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Oct;472(10):3150-8.

125 patients were randomized to use of either fluoroscopy or imageless navigation for the placement of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of the study was to investigate whether use of imageless navigation improves accuracy, increases precision or reduces outliers in leg length and global/femoral offset restoration when compared to fluoroscopy in THA via anterolateral approach. Results revealed that fluoroscopy and navigation did not significantly differ with respect to accuracy of leg length and overall offset. However, significant difference was evident in precision between groups for leg length, and global/femoral offset (absolute difference between preoperative plan and postoperative result), with increased precision noted in the navigation group. The rate of outliers outside 5mm deviation for leg length, global offset, and femoral offset was higher in the fluoroscopy group than the navigation group for all three parameters. Groups were similar when considering outliers at a benchmark of 8mm.

Unlock the full ACE Report

You have access to {0} free articles per month.
Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
{0} of {1} free articles

Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.

Upgrade Now
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade Account
Upgrade
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Navigation-guided versus fluoroscopy-controlled THA: leg length and global/femoral offset. ACE Report. 2015;5(1):21. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report