
Arthroplasty
Comparison of clinical outcome with the Triathlon vs. Kinemax knee system
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):64-70
212 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a Triathlon implant or Kinemax implant. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of the newer-generation device (Triathlon) versus the older-generation knee system (Kinemax). Oxford Knee Score, pain, range of motion, lower limb power symmetry, and patient satisfaction were assessed over 3 years postoperatively. Results demonstrated slightly, but borderline significantly greater improvement in OKS from baseline to 1 year in the Triathlon versus Kinemax group. The Triathlon was also noted to have significantly greater improvement in flexion, greater recovery of operative limb power, and reduced maximum pain experienced. Patient satisfaction was also higher with the Triathlon knee system.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.