ARTHROPLASTY
Swanson vs Sutter prostheses for metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015 Feb;49(1):45-51.Six randomized controlled trials (143 patients) were included in this review which compared Sutter and Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty prostheses, with 5 of the studies also being used in the meta-analysis. Range of motion, incidence of prosthesis fracture, recurrence of ulnar drift, and grip strength were among the outcomes measured for up to 5 years. Pooled results indicated that the Sutter prosthesis may allow for significantly less risk of recurrence drift than the Swanson prosthesis, although there was no significant difference between groups in fracture risk. There was insufficient reporting of outcomes such as range of motion, pain, cosmesis, and function, and therefore meta-analysis was unable to be performed in these cases.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
