ARTHROPLASTY
AAOS 2015: Short-term rehab outcomes following direct anterior vs. posterior THA
49 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to have the procedure performed through either a direct anterior or posterior approach. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) provided benefits over the posterior approach (PA) when considering short-term (6-week) rehabilitation outcomes, including: time to discontinuation of walking aids, patient-reported outcome measures, instrumented performance tests, and hospital stay. Results demonstrated shorter use of walking aids and shorter length of hospital stay in the DAA group. However, there were no differences between groups in instrumented or patient-reported outcome after 6 weeks, with the exception of pain relief, which favoured DAA.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
